General Information of Natural Product (ID: NP0320)
  Natural Product Name
Cis-3-Hexenal
  Synonyms
cis-3-Hexenal; (Z)-Hex-3-enal; 6789-80-6; (Z)-3-HEXENAL; 3-Hexenal, (Z)-; 3-(Z)-Hexenal; (3Z)-Hexenal; cis-3-Hexenal solution; (3Z)-3-Hexenal; (Z)-3-hexen-1-al; 3Z-hexenal; UNII-6V54TKA96C; Hex-cis-3-enal; cis-3-hexen-1-al (Neat); 6V54TKA96C; FEMA 2561; hex-3-enal; 3-Hexenal, cis-; FEMA No. 2561; cis-beta,gamma-Hexylenic aldehyde; 4-01-00-03469 (Beilstein Handbook Reference); EINECS 229-854-4; BRN 1720171; cis-hex-3-enal; Z-3-hexenal; (Z)-3-hexanal; (Z)-Hex-3enal; 3Z-Hexen-1-al; (3Z)-hex-3-enal; CHEBI:23292; DTXSID30884335; LMFA06000110; ZINC12153803; (Z)-hex-3-enal, 50% in triacetin; 3Z-Hexen-1-al (50% in triacetin); AKOS022632572; cis-.beta.,.gamma.-Hexylenic aldehyde; cis-3-hexen-1-al (50% in Triacetin); Q158587; cis-3-Hexenal solution, 50% in triacetin, stabilized; UNII-3300F8DZ5A component GXANMBISFKBPEX-ARJAWSKDSA-N
Click to Show/Hide
  Formula C6H10O
  Weight 98.14
  Structure Could Not Find 2D Structure
3D Structure Download 2D Structure Download
  InChI InChI=1S/C6H10O/c1-2-3-4-5-6-7/h3-4,6H,2,5H2,1H3/b4-3-
  InChI Key GXANMBISFKBPEX-ARJAWSKDSA-N
  Isomeric SMILES CC/C=C\\CC=O
  Canonical SMILES CCC=CCC=O
  External Links PubChem ID 643941
CAS ID 6789-80-6

 The Content Variation of Natural Product Induced by Different Factor(s)
      Species Name: Salvia euphratica
  Factor Name: Variety Comparison [1]
              Species Info Factor Info
               Experiment Detail
Aerial parts of both varieties(Salvia euphratica Montbret et Aucher ex Benth. var. euphratica and Salvia euphratica Montbret et Aucher ex Benth. var. leiocalycina) were collected in Malatya, Turkey in June 1999.
Click to Show/Hide
               Factor Function
Ninety-five compounds in var. euphratica and 94 compounds in var. leiocalycina were characterized representing 93% and 95% of the total components detected, respectively, with 1,8-cineole (13.8% and 15.2%) and myrtenyl acetate (15.9% and 13.9%) as main constituents.
Click to Show/Hide
               Factor Part Location NP Content
 
Salvia euphratica var. euphratica
Flowering aerial parts Turkey
NP Content: 0.1 %
      Species Name: Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir
  Factor Name: Drought Stress Treatment [2]
              Species Info Factor Info
               Experiment Detail
3-year old single shoot V. vinifera plants (cultivar Pinot noir 18 Gm grafted on Kober 5BB, 51 plants) potted in 3L pots in a sandy loam soil were used. All plants were well watered (200 mL per day) at the beginning of the experiment (04.06.2010; DAY 0; 5 plants) and water was supplied to all control plants once every day (250 mL per day), whereas water supply of stressed plants was stopped. Physiological measurements and sampling of leaves took place on 07.06.2010 (DAY 3; 5 control, 5 stressed plants), 10.06.2010 (DAY 6; 5 control, 5 stressed plants) and 12.06.2010 (DAY 8; 5 control, 10 stressed plants). Due to very hot weather conditions in June 2010 the experiment was stopped after 8 days and 12 available control plants were used to restart the drought treatment with 6 control and 6 stressed plants on 11.06.2010 and all plants were measured on 15.06.2010 (DAY 5). The mean leaf temperatures at midday were: 25 ℃ (04.06.2010; DAY 0), 31.9 ℃ (07.06.2010; DAY 3), 30.8 ℃ (15.06.2010; DAY 5), 35.8 ℃ (10.06.2010; DAY 6) and 35.7 ℃ (12.06.2010; DAY 8). The mean PAR radiation per day (measured from 6:00 am till 7:00 pm) was 144.1 µmol m-2 s-1. Each plant was used only once for physiological measurements and sampling of leaves.On every day of the experiment (day 0, 3, 5, 6, 8) the pot weight and the volumetric soil moisture content (ThetaProbe ML2x and handheld data logger Moisture Meter HH2, Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, United Kingdom) was recorded. The water potential (PWSC Model 3000, Soilmoisture Equipment Corporation, Santa Barbara, USA) was determined for the 6th leaf (representing the insertion level of the shoot from the basis) of every plant and measurement day. Chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange parameters of light adapted leaves were determined with the 4th and 5th leaf, whereas dark adaptation was performed only with the 5th leaf. Immediately after these non-invasive measurements, the 5th leaf was harvested, frozen in liquid nitrogen and further used for the measurement of polyphenols, selected primary metabolites and volatiles (VOCs).
Click to Show/Hide
               Factor Function
The content of different groups of primary and secondary metabolites is significantly influenced by severe drought stress in grapevine leaves. The content of the majority of the metabolites (around 60% of primary metabolites, around 85% of polyphenols and about 40% of the detected and identified VOCs) increased upon drought stress treatment. Among these especially the primary metabolites citric acid and glyceric acid were strongly influenced by the short as well as the prolonged drought stress treatment, whereas all polyphenols were only induced upon the prolonged drought stress treatment.
Click to Show/Hide
               Factor Part Location NP Content
 
Normal condition
Leaves Vienna, Austria
NP Content: 34425.3 ± 16747.6 peak areas
 
Dry 3-5 days
Leaves Vienna, Austria
NP Content: 47477.5 ± 23350.9 peak areas
 
Dry 6-8 days
Leaves Vienna, Austria
NP Content: 29348.9 ± 17803.4 peak areas
References
1 The Essential Oils of Two Varieties of Salvia euphratica Montbret et Aucher ex Benth. var. euphratica and var. leiocalycina (Rech. fil.) Hedge from Turkey
2 Severe drought stress is affecting selected primary metabolites, polyphenols, and volatile metabolites in grapevine leaves (Vitis vinifera cv. Pinot noir)