| General Information of Natural Product (ID: NP0836) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural Product Name |
Carotenoids
|
||||||
| The Content Variation of Natural Product Induced by Different Factor(s) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species Name: Brassica juncea (var. RLC-1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Name: K2CrO4 Treatment; Na2SeO4 Treatment | [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Experiment Detail |
The seeds were surface sterilized and then soaked for two hours and sown in soil mixture having 3 parts of garden soil, 1 part of sand and 1 part of manure. The experiment was carried out in earthen pots of uniform size each containing 5 Kg of the soil mixture. Before sowing, the soil was amended with K2CrO4 for Cr treatments (0 µM/Kg), and Na2SeO4 for Se treatments (0 µM/Kg), both alone and in combinations. The concentration used for Cr was 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50), while for Se, the most stimulatory concentrations as observed from preliminary studies were used. The pots were kept in natural environmental conditions and were watered regularly. The experiment was conducted in triplicates. The harvesting of the plants was done after 30 days of sowing and stored at -20 ℃ . Some harvested plants were also dried by keeping them in hot air oven for 24 h at 80 ℃.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Function |
Se application aided in improving plant growth, reducing the oxidative damage and strengthening the antioxidative defence system in plants raised in soils with binary combinations of Cr and Se. Photosynthesis, which is one of the vital physiological processes, was positively influenced with application of Se. It helped in minimising the toxicity of Cr and enhanced the contents of pigments. The efficiency of photosynthetic machinery was further strengthened by the increase of net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2 concentration, and hence indicated its importance in combating stress. The study also highlighted the role of Se in enhancing the contents of secondary metabolites which play an important role in heavy metal chelation, complex formation and ROS scavenging, thereby reducing the chances of Cr to cause physiological damage.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mechanism |
A significant modulation in gene expression was observed in B. juncea in response to Cr and Se. The gene responsible for H2O2 production is respiratory burst oxidase (RBO) which showed a significant upregulation in its expression by 3.63 folds in response to Cr treatment. Se at 2 µM/Kg in combination with 300 µM/Kg Cr caused decrease by 1.62 folds in the expression of RBO gene.An increase in expression was observed SOD, CAT and GST-1 by 2.75 folds, 2.82 folds and 2.03 folds respectively in response to Cr. However, Cr treatment resulted in a reduction of relative expression of POD and GR genes by 0.54 and 0.61 folds respectively in leaves of B. juncea plants. The combined treatment of Se and Cr aided in reducing Cr toxicity by increasing the expression of genes coding all these enzymes. Maximum increase in expression in case of CAT (4.68 folds), GR (2.08 folds) and GST-1 (2.98 folds) was observed at binary combination of 4 µM/Kg Se and 300 µM/Kg Cr. For SOD, 4.25 folds increase in gene expression was observed at 6 µM/Kg Se and 300 µM/Kg Cr. The expression of POD enhanced by 1.75 folds at the concentration of 2 µM/Kg Se and 300 µM/Kg Cr. The genes coding forcholrophyllase (CHLASE) chalcone synthase (CHS) and phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) showed enhanced expression of 2.47 folds, 1.79 folds and 2.07 folds respectively in the plants raised in Cr spiked soils. The co-application of Se and Cr helped in increasing the expression of CHS and PAL, while aided in reducing the expression of CHLASE. The concentration of 4 µM/Kg for Se proved to be most beneficial for enhancing the gene expression of PAL by 3.92 folds, while the same concentration caused a decline in the expression of CHALSE by 1.65 folds. However, for CHS expression, 6 µM/Kg Se caused an increase by 2.52 folds. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA and MLR supported the observations. The values of beta-regression coefficients for Se indicated the stress alleviating effects of Se for all the genes.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor | Part | Location | NP Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 0 µ/Kg Na2SeO4 (Control)
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.195 ± 0.005 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 2 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.196 ± 0.0079 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 4 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.314 ± 0.0106 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 6 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.261 ± 0.0024 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 0 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.128 ± 0.0033 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 2 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.208 ± 0.0071 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 4 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.192 ± 0.0009 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 6 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Fresh leaves | Ludhiana, Punjab, India. |
NP Content: 0.219 ± 0.0124 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Name: K2CrO4 Treatment; Na2SeO4 Treatment | [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Experiment Detail |
The seeds of B. juncea(var. RLC 1) were sterilized with 0.01% mercuric chloride (HgCl2), soaked in distilled water for 2h (h), and germinated in Petri dishes lined with Whatman No. 1 filter paper moistened with 3 ml solutions of sodium selenate (Na2SeO4) (2, 4, and 6µM) and potassium chromate (K2CrO4) (300µM), in unary and binary treatments. The concentrations of the elements were decided on the basis of preliminary experiments by obtaining the most stimulatory concentration of Se and 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of Cr. The treatment solutions were prepared in half strength Hoagland's nutrient medium and the experiment was conducted in triplicates with 16hphotoperiodand 25℃ temperature. The seedlings were harvested after 15days for the estimation of various parameters.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Function |
In conclusion, Cr negatively affects the metabolic activities of B. juncea, which were restored by Se application. Se application showed its protective effects on photosynthetic pigments and gene expression studies confirmed the spectrophotometric observations. The Scanning electron microscope (SEM) studies also clearly indicated the positive effects of Se against Cr toxicity on morphology and density of stomata, which further confirmed its imperative role in efficient gas exchange for both photosynthesis and respiration. Exogenous application of Se was also observed to enhance the lipid- and water-soluble antioxidants, which further indicated its role in alleviating oxidative damage. The positive effect of Se in maintaining the osmotic homeostasis as well as activation of thiols in Cr-stressed seedlings also showed its potential to enhance the ability of B. juncea seedlings to combat heavy metal stress effectively. The results, therefore, indicate that Se can be effectively used as a mitigating agent against Cr stress.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mechanism |
Treatments of Se and Cr aided in modulating the gene expression of CHLASE, PSY and CHS. CHLASE showed a significant upregulation of 366.3% in its expression in the Cr treated seedlings with respect to untreated control seedlings. The expression of PSY, however, was observed to be downregulated with Cr application by 28.6%, while CHS expression showed an upregulation by 73.13%. Se application at 4 µM in combination with 300 µM Cr downregulated its expression by 46.92% when compared to Cr-treated seedlings. On the other hand, the same concentration of Se caused an increase of PSY and CHS expression by 425.2 and 209.4%, respectively.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor | Part | Location | NP Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 0 µ/Kg Na2SeO4 (Control)
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.01747 ± 0.00072 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 2 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.016 ± 0.0001 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 4 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.01463 ± 0.00145 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 6 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.0138 ± 0.00043 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 0 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.0114 ± 0.00032 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 2 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.0135 ± 0.0002 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 4 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.01517 ± 0.0004 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
300 µ/Kg K2CrO4 + 6 µ/Kg Na2SeO4
|
Seedlings | NA |
NP Content: 0.01247 ± 0.00118 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Name: CdCl2 Treatment; Earthworms Treatment | [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Experiment Detail |
To observe the effect of earthworms in Cd-polluted soils, a pot experiment was conducted. The seeds were washed with Tween 20 and surface sterilized before sowing. The pots were filled with soil and cattle dung (partially decomposed) in the ratio of 2:1. The pots were inoculated with earthworms (5 earthworms Kg -1 soil) 7 days prior to sowing, and seeds were then uniformly sown in pots. Plants were allowed to grow under natural conditions and then harvested after 30 and 60 days after sowing (DAS).Different concentrations of Cd (0.50, 0.75, 1.00 and 1.25 mM) were prepared using CdCl2 (anhydrous) obtained from HiMedia. The various concentrations were prepared by dissolving CdCl2 in double-distilled water. The soil was spiked with the different concentrations of Cd and analysed for Cd concentration before experimental set-up using atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). The Cd content was found to be approximately 56 mg (0.5 mM Cd), 84 mg (0.75 mM Cd), 112 mg (1.00 mM Cd) and 140 mg (1.25 mM) in respective concentrations per kilogram of soil. All metal-treated soils were supplemented with fixed number of earthworms. Two sets were maintained which included one without earthworms (WTE) and other supplemented with earthworms (WE).
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Function |
Earthworms help to mitigate the toxic effects produced by Cd on plant growth and photosynthetic efficiency along with enhanced phytoremediation capacity when co-inoculated with Cd in soil.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mechanism |
In the present study, the expression of genes CHLASE, PSY, CHS and PAL was enhanced in plants grown in Cd-treated soils supplemented with earthworms. Significant differences in expression of CHLASE, PSY, CHS and PAL were observed after the analysis of data using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. The expression of gene CHLASE was enhanced by 1.56-fold in Cd-treated plants which was further enhanced to 3.63-fold when earthworms were co-inoculated along with Cd-treated soils. In comparison to control plants, the expression of PSY and CHS was significantly enhanced by 1.43-fold and 2.07-fold when plants were grown in 1.25 mM Cd treatment. The expression was further enhanced to 3.32-fold (PSY) and 3.37-fold (CHS) when earthworms were supplemented along with Cd treatment (1.25 mM). Similarly, significant increase in the expression of PAL was also observed in Cd-treated plants by 1.64-fold in Cd-treated soil which was enhanced to 2.74-fold in the presence of earthworms.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor | Part | Location | NP Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.132 ± 0.001 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.020 ± 0.001 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.179 ± 0.002 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.50 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.101 ± 0.004 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.75 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.098 ± 0.004 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.00 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.094 ± 0.004 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.25 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.077 ± 0.003 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.50 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.145 ± 0.002 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.75 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.139 ± 0.003 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.00 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.135 ± 0.002 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.25 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.107 ± 0.004 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.108 ± 0.001 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM CdCl2 + without earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.153 ± 0.002 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.50 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.122 ± 0.003 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.75 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.089 ± 0.005 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.00 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.082 ± 0.004 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.25 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 30 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.079 ± 0.005 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.50 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.168 ± 0.002 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.75 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.151 ± 0.003 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.00 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.143 ± 0.003 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1.25 mM CdCl2 + with earthworms + 60 DAS
|
NA | Ludhiana, India |
NP Content: 0.113 ± 0.003 mg/g
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Species Name: Brassica juncea L. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Name: CdCl2 Treatment; Citric Acid Treatment; Castasterone Treatment | [4] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Experiment Detail |
Earthen pots (12 in. diameter) were filled with five kg of soil per pot and arranged in a randomized block design (Kothari, 2004) with 5 pots for each treatment. 0 mM Cd(II) was added to the soil in form of anhydrous CdCl2. The seeds of B. juncea var. RLC-1 (procured from Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India) were surface sterilized with 0.5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite. These were then soaked in different concentration of castasterone (CS) (0 nM) for 8 h before sowing. After seven days of germination, 0 mM citric acid (CA) was supplemented to the soil. The plants were harvested after 30 days of sowing, and fresh mature top leaves were analysed for biochemical, physiological and molecular studies.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Function |
Castasterone (CS) and Citric Acid (CA) treatments also improved the osmolyte contents of the leaves which enabled the plants to tide over Cd (II) stress. Beta regression and multiple linear regression analysis showed that CS treatment has more positive effect on shoot height, fresh weight and photosynthetic pigments and efficiency than the CA treatment. The most effective concentration enhancing Cd(II) stress tolerance in B. juncea plants was seed soaking treatment with 100 nM CS and soil application of 0.6 mM/kg CA soil.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mechanism |
The present study found that relative expression of CHLASE gene was significantly increased by 3.57 folds under Cd(II) toxicity. Seed pre-sowing treatment of 100 nM CS and soil citric acid application significantly lowered expression of CHLASE in 30 day old B. juncea leaves. MLR analysis also revealed positive effect of Cd(II) and negative effects of CA and CS treatments on fold change of CHLASE expression. Maximum reduction in CHLASE expression of 1.19 fold was observed with binary combination of CS (100 nM) and CA (0.6 mM/kg) in the leaves of Cd(II) stressed B. juncea.Expression of PSY and CHS genes was significantly enhanced by binary combination of CS and CA treatment by 2.85 fold and 5.15 fold, respectively. MLR analysis also revealed that CS, CA and Cd(II) treatments positively regressed on fold change of PSY and CHS expressions.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor | Part | Location | NP Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0 nM Castasterone (Control)
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.8 ± 0.19 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0.01 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.8 ± 0.16 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 1 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.9 ± 0.15 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 100 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 4.2 ± 0.25 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.8 ± 0.15 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0.01 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 4 ± 0.24 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 1 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.9 ± 0.15 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 100 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 4.4 ± 0.26 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 2.6 ± 0.18 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0.01 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.1 ± 0.11 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 1 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.3 ± 0.26 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 100 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.4 ± 0.11 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.5 ± 0.29 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 0.01 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.9 ± 0.29 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 1 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 3.8 ± 0.33 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0.6 mM/kg CdCl2 + 0.6 mM/kg Citric Acid+ 100 nM Castasterone
|
Fresh leaves | NA |
NP Content: 4 ± 0.09 mg/g dry weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Species Name: Citrus reticulata | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Name: ZnSO4 Treatment | [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Experiment Detail |
One year-old uniform and well-rooted plants (45 cm height) of mandarin orange (raised in sand bed nursery), were transplanted in earthen pots (12″ diameter) filled with well-sieved acid-washed sand. Plants were supplied with 1/10 strength of MS solution (pH 5.6) every alternative day. Seven weeks after transplanting, the stress treatment was applied for 14 weeks until pronounced visual structural indications of stress (e.g., chlorosis of leaves, growth impairment etc.) appeared. On every alternate day, each pot was fed with 500 ml of 1/10 strength MS solution (pH 5.6) together with ZnSO4 solutions containing 1 mM, 2 mM, 3 mM, 4 mM, 5 mM, 10 mM, 15 mM and 20 mM of Zn. Without Zn (0 mM Zn) was served as the control.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Function |
Zn stress reduced the photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration along with reduction of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids content in leaf.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor | Part | Location | NP Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
0 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 552.87 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 532.82 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 575.89 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
3 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 613.33 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
4 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 434.64 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
5 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 685.43 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
10 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 593.23 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
15 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 504.06 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
20 mM ZnSO4 treatment
|
leaf | NA |
NP Content: 482.82 µg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Species Name: Zanthoxylum bungeanum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Name: Plant community composition; Water Stress Treatment | [6] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Experiment Detail |
Study site: The experimental site was located in Mao county eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (31° 41′ N, 103° 53′ E, elevation 1686 m). According to meteorological monitoring data from the Mao County Ecological Station of Chinese Academy of Science, the mean annual precipitation in the area is 920 mm, mean annual temperature is 8.9 ℃ and extreme minimum and maximum temperatures recorded are -11.6 ℃, and 32.2 ℃, respectively. The total precipitation in August is approximately 90 mm, and it is considered as the month with the most rainfall. The soils are classified as Udic Luvisols. Experimental design: A batch of uniform, two-year-old seedlings of Z. bungeanum were planted in April 2013. Six experimental treatments were set up as a randomized design with three replicates, with 18 plots of 2.6 m × 2.6 m spaced at least 1 m apart from each other. The three planting systems were as follows: (1) Z. bungeanum + Glycine max (Z-G); (2) Z. bungeanum + Z. bungeanum + Capsicum annum (Z-C); (3) Z. bungeanum monoculture (Z). G. max and C. annuum were planted in April 2015. One Z. bungeanum was grown in the center of each plot, while species of G. max and C. annuum were planted at the same density (0.27 m2/individual) in all plots. No additional fertilization was applied after the experiment commenced, and the weeds in each plot were completely removed by hand each week. Z. bungeanum and intercrops were grown under natural rainfall before simulating extreme precipitation. In August 2015, we exposed our plots, to the precipitation treatment at random, in which triplicate plots per system received either normal (control) or extreme rainfall. To avoid external rainfall effects, all plots were kept under rainout shelters during the experimental period (from 1″t August to 30th September 2015) to control soil moisture. To minimize greenhouse effects, the rainout shelters for each plot were situated 2 m aboveground. Tap water was used to mimic extreme rainfall events, and a watering pot was used to compensate for rain. Rainfall regimes were designated, based on the average rainfall in the area during August of 3 mm/day (based on the average rainfall data during 1983-2013 from the Mao County Ecological Station of Chinese Academy of Science). This was designed as the control rain regime, while extreme rainfall was designated according to the abnormally high rainfall in August of 9.5 mm/day. Each planting system was first divided into two groups of different treatments: (1) Extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day) and (2) Mean rainfall (Control, 3.0 mm/day). During the two-month-long experimental period, all the plots were watered in the morning (7-9 am) and evening (6-8 pm). After one month of extreme rainfall and control treatments, the systems were subsequently subjected to one month of recovery with rainfall of 3.0 mm/day. Around all plots, thick PVC panels were inserted to a depth of 0.5 m into the soil to prevent the lateral water movement between the plots and prevent interactions with roots from neighboring plots. Plant leaf collection: At the end of each stage, the youngest fully expanded Z. bungeanum, G. max, and C. annum leaves at the same developmental stage among plots were collected and placed in a liquid nitrogen container.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor Function |
The results indicated that, extreme rainfall had significantly negative impacts on Z. bungeanum in three intercropping systems. However, intercropping with G. max improved the transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (Gs), raised leaf relative water content (LRWC), increased chlorophyll a (Chl a) and carotenoid (Car) content, and enhanced the superoxide dismutase activity (SOD) of Z. bungeanum. After recovery, the Z. bungeanum + G. max mixed culture significantly increased soil NO3 -N, improved the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Ci) and Tr, upregulated soluble sugar and proline, and enhanced hydrogen peroxidase activity (CAT). Moreover, the higher root biomass of G. max provided much more nitrogen for Z. bungeanum via the return of organic matter. However, intercropping with C. annum significantly increased active oxygen (ROS). Compared with neighboring species, in intercropping systems, G. max could have improved the tolerance of the focal species Z. bungeanum in response to extreme rainfall and its recovery after extreme rainfall.
Click to Show/Hide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Factor | Part | Location | NP Content | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Zanthoxylum bungeanum: 30 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.54 ± 0.23 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum: 60 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.83 ± 0.03 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum: 30 DAS extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.85 ± 0.06 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum: 30 DAS extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day) + 30 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 2.23 ± 0.09 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Zanthoxylum bungeanum and Capsicum annum: 30 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 2.07 ± 0.17 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum and C. annum: 60 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.51 ± 0.03 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum and C. annum: 30 DAS extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.94 ± 0.11 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum and C. annum: 30 DAS extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day) + 30 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.83 ± 0.16 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Zanthoxylum bungeanum and Glycine max: 30 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 1.90 ± 0.04 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum and G. max: 60 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 2.23 ± 0.11 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum and G. max: 30 DAS extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 2.43 ± 0.07 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Z. bungeanum and G. max: 30 DAS extreme rainfall (9.5 mm/day) + 30 DAS normal rainfall (3.0 mm/day)
|
Leaves | Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China |
NP Content: 2.16 ± 0.06 mg/g fresh weight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||